Comments on: Nuns target of new sex abuse suits filed against Catholic church in Portland http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/ If you were a victim of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, you are not alone. We are here to help. Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:24:59 +0000 hourly 1 By: karlo Heppner http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/comment-page-1/#comment-32 karlo Heppner Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:30:00 +0000 http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/#comment-32 Hallo Hans-Jürgen, deine Mutter ist gestorben, bitte melde dich. Karlo karlo27@terra.es Hallo Hans-Jürgen,
deine Mutter ist gestorben, bitte melde dich.
Karlo
karlo27@terra.es

]]> By: JOHN ADAMS WEAVER http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/comment-page-1/#comment-16 JOHN ADAMS WEAVER Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:56:46 +0000 http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/#comment-16 ANOTHER THING I COULD NOT HELP BUT NOTICING ALREADY, IT IS THAT 90% OF ALL ABUSE CASES WERE YOUNG ADOLESCENT BOYS, BETWEEN THE AGES OF 13-17, WHO PROBABLY BY NOW ARE IN THEIR 30S OR PERHAPS, AT LEAST 10 YEARS OLDER, WHICH WOULD PUT THEM AT THE AGE OF ABOUT 23-27, HAS ANY STUDY EVER BEEN MADE TO DETERMINE HOW MANY OF THESE BOYS, BELONG TO ANY SECRETIVE SOCIETIES, LIKE THE DEMOLAYS, AND THE MASONIC ORDER, IF NOT, I CONSIDER SUCH STUDIES "LONG OVERDUE"! I CONSIDER THE "CHARGE OF LYING TESTIMONY", IN ORDER TO "BLEED THE CHURCH DRY OF FUNDS" OR TO "DESTROY THE CREDIBILITY OF CHURCH OFFICIALS", NOT BEYOND THE POWER OF A GOVERNMENT THAT SEEKS TO "COVER UP CHARGES OF MURDER AND TREASON" BY THOSE WHO LIKEWISE ENGAGE IN "HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES" BEHIND CLOSED DOORS! ANOTHER THING I COULD NOT HELP BUT NOTICING ALREADY, IT IS THAT 90% OF ALL ABUSE CASES WERE YOUNG ADOLESCENT BOYS, BETWEEN THE AGES OF 13-17, WHO PROBABLY BY NOW ARE IN THEIR 30S OR PERHAPS, AT LEAST 10 YEARS OLDER, WHICH WOULD PUT THEM AT THE AGE OF ABOUT 23-27, HAS ANY STUDY EVER BEEN MADE TO DETERMINE HOW MANY OF THESE BOYS, BELONG TO ANY SECRETIVE SOCIETIES, LIKE THE DEMOLAYS, AND THE MASONIC ORDER, IF NOT, I CONSIDER SUCH STUDIES “LONG OVERDUE”!

I CONSIDER THE “CHARGE OF LYING TESTIMONY”, IN ORDER TO “BLEED THE CHURCH DRY OF FUNDS” OR TO “DESTROY THE CREDIBILITY OF CHURCH OFFICIALS”, NOT BEYOND THE POWER OF A GOVERNMENT THAT SEEKS TO “COVER UP CHARGES OF MURDER AND TREASON” BY THOSE WHO LIKEWISE ENGAGE IN “HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES” BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!

]]> By: JOHN ADAMS WEAVER http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/comment-page-1/#comment-15 JOHN ADAMS WEAVER Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:52:27 +0000 http://www.priest-abuse.com/in-the-news/nuns-target-of-new-sex-abuse-suits-filed-against-catholic-church-in-portland/#comment-15 This is to enquire as to how well the "credibility of witnesses" to abuse was established, also to determine if "threatening the solvency" of the catholic faith is the "proper way" to go about handling these abuse cases, my question in particular is why the "CHURCH IS REQUIRED TO PAY OUT, WHEN CLEARLY THE VICTIMS WERE NOT VICTIMIZED BY THE CHURCH AS A WHOLE BUT BY THE ACTIONS OF A FEW PERPETRATORS, THAT CLEARLY ACTED CONTRARY TO CANONICAL LAW, AND SHOULD HAVE OF COURSE HAVE BEEN DISCIPLINED, BUT HOW CAN THE CHURCH BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR "CONDUCT" IT CLEARLY CONDEMNS IN ALL ITS TEACHINGS AND ABHORS AS A "SIN AGAINST NATURE?" This is to enquire as to how well the “credibility of witnesses” to abuse was established, also to determine if “threatening the solvency” of the catholic faith is the “proper way” to go about handling these abuse cases, my question in particular is why the “CHURCH IS REQUIRED TO PAY OUT, WHEN CLEARLY THE VICTIMS WERE NOT VICTIMIZED BY THE CHURCH AS A WHOLE BUT BY THE ACTIONS OF A FEW PERPETRATORS, THAT CLEARLY ACTED CONTRARY TO CANONICAL LAW, AND SHOULD HAVE OF COURSE HAVE BEEN DISCIPLINED, BUT HOW CAN THE CHURCH BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR “CONDUCT” IT CLEARLY CONDEMNS IN ALL ITS TEACHINGS AND ABHORS AS A “SIN AGAINST NATURE?”

]]>